For parents whose kid is having a hard run — wagging, drinking,
shutting the door, in trouble, or just gone quiet. Eight short talks by Col —
a computer-generated, fictional character who tells it how it is, through
the eyes of everyday people.
AI-generated image. Col is not a real person.
I’m not a counsellor. I’m a bloke with a hat.
What I’ve got is eight short talks. The good ideas that people who do this for a living worked out, said the way I’d say them over the fence. I walk on, I say my bit, I walk off. The rest is yours.
— Col
Who’s Col?
Col is a computer-generated, fictional character who tells it how it is, through the
eyes of everyday people. The way he tells it, he’s a retired shearer and a grandad
who never took the star badge his grandkid gave him off his hat. None of that is real, and
neither is he: his voice is computer-generated, and so is his picture. He isn’t a counsellor
and he doesn’t pretend to be one. He walks on, gives a short talk, and walks
off — like a TED talk. Under each talk, the same ideas are set out on one page. His
stories are a character’s stories.
The ideas under his words aren’t his either. They’re established ones, used by
people who work with families, and each talk says where its idea comes from so you can
look it up yourself.
Nothing here is advice about your child. If you’re worried about your family, talk
to someone who can actually meet you — your GP, or counselling
at ParkSyde.
Where this is up to
First edition, 23 September 2026. Every talk has Col’s voice and every word written
out, so you can listen, read, or both, and each one is filmed on the Forum stage and up on
YouTube. This page is the transcript and the handout for all eight.
Shane at ParkSyde read it through on 30 September 2026.
It’s all here, and none of it costs anything.
How to use it
One talk a week, not all at once. The point of eight talks is the seven weeks between
them, where you try something at home and see what happens. Each talk ends with a
sheet — print it, or copy it onto the back of an envelope. If you’re doing this
with a partner, a mate or a worker, there are questions for the two of you.
Talk one
Everyone’s doing the best they can with what they’ve got
How you’re looking at it, and what’s actually yours to fix.
Col walks on · 4 min 11
Col’s voice is computer-generated. Every word he says is written out below.
Before anything else, you should know what I am. I’m not real. I’m a computer-generated character, and the voice you’re hearing is a computer’s. What I’m good for is telling it how it is, the way everyday people see it.
I’m not a counsellor, either. I’m not a psychologist. The way I tell it, I sheared sheep for thirty years, then I taught at TAFE, and now I’ve got a grandkid at my kitchen table most days. So I’m not going to tell you what to do with your kid. I’m going to tell you a few things the people who do this for a living worked out, and I’m going to tell them the way I’d tell them over the fence.
Here’s the first thing. You’re not here because you stuffed up.
(pause)
You’re here because you love a kid who’s having a hard run. You’ve tried things. Some of them didn’t work. That’s not failing. That’s parenting.
Now. A story from the sheds.
A wet sheep won’t shear. Doesn’t matter who you are. Best gun in the district, and a wet sheep will still clog your combs and cut the animal and ruin your day. The young blokes used to blame the handpiece. They’d blame the sheep. They’d blame the weather. The old blokes just looked at the sky and said, ‘Wet ones. Pen ’em up. Tomorrow.’
Half of what you’re about to do in these talks is working out what’s a wet sheep, and what’s you.
So, two ideas.
The first one’s about glasses. Not these ones. The ones you can’t see. Everyone looks at their kid through a lens, and the lens is made out of your own life. How you were raised. What you’re scared of. What somebody once said about kids like yours.
Your kid won’t get out of bed. Through one lens, that’s lazy. Through another, that’s a kid who’s scared of failing, so he’s not going to try. Through another, that’s a kid who was on his phone till three because something’s eating at him and he couldn’t sleep.
Same kid. Same bed. Three different mornings, depending on the glasses.
And the glasses decide what you do next. Lazy gets a yelling. Scared gets a different conversation altogether.
I’m not asking you to pick the right lens. I’m asking you to notice you’ve got one on. Notice, and try another pair on before you act.
Oh, and your kid’s wearing a pair too. About you.
The second idea’s about paddocks. Three of them.
The house paddock is what you control. Your words. Your tone. The rules of your house. What you do when you’re angry. Whether you look after yourself.
The next paddock over is what you can influence. Their choices. Their mates. How school goes. You can’t walk in there and move the stock yourself. You can only call them, and they come if they trust you.
And the back country is what you can’t control. What they finally decide. Other people. What’s already happened.
Most parents I know with a kid doing it hard are out in the back country every night, carrying the whole lot on their shoulders. And they’ve got nothing left for the house paddock, which is the only one they can actually work.
So this week, when you’re wound up, and you will be, ask two things. What glasses have I got on? And which paddock is this in?
You don’t have to get the answer right. Just ask.
That’s me. See you at the next one.
Col walks off.
That’s the talk. The same ideas on one page, and what to do with them this week:
The lens you’re wearing
Everybody looks at what happens through a lens made of their own history: how they were
raised, what they’re scared of, what they were told about kids like theirs. The same
morning — a kid who won’t get out of bed — reads as lazy through one
lens, scared of failing through another, and exhausted through a third.
The lens decides what you do next. The point isn’t to find the right one. It’s
to notice you’re wearing one, and to try another on before you act. Your kid wears a lens
too — about you.
And most of what drives behaviour isn’t on show, to them or to you. What you see is the
tip: the door slammed, the day wagged. Underneath is what does the steering — fear, shame,
tiredness, wanting to belong somewhere. Behaviour makes more sense once you ask what it’s
doing for them.
Three paddocks: control, influence, and the back country
The house paddock: what you control. Your words, your tone, the house rules, what you do
when you’re angry, whether you look after yourself, when you raise something.
The next paddock: what you can influence. Their choices, their friends, how school goes
— but only through the relationship, and never directly.
The back country: what you can’t control. What they finally decide. Other people. The
past.
Worry spent in the back country is worry you don’t have for the house paddock, which
is the only one you can actually work.
Try this at home
Next time you’re wound up, before you do anything, ask two questions: what lens
am I wearing? and which paddock is this in? Just ask them. You don’t have to
get the answer right.
Sheet one · for you
My three paddocks
Things I control:
Things I can influence, through the relationship:
Something I can’t control, and will try to stop carrying this week:
A lens I caught myself wearing:
Another way of looking at the same thing:
If you’re watching with someone
What lens did your own parents wear about you when you were this age?
What do you spend the most worry on? Which paddock is it in?
Where it comes from. The three paddocks are a plain version of the
circles of control, influence and concern (Stephen Covey, 1989). “What’s underneath
does the steering” is the everyday form of an old idea from psychodynamic thinking, that
much of what moves us sits outside awareness. “Everyone is doing the best they can with
what they have” is a working assumption in strengths-based family work: not a fact about
any one person, but a better starting point than the alternative.
Talk two
Where they’re at
How change actually happens, and what helps at each step.
Col walks on · 3 min 22
Col’s voice is computer-generated. Every word he says is written out below.
My brother-in-law Russ smoked for forty years. His wife tried. His doctor tried. His kids hid his smokes and stuck pictures of black lungs on the fridge. Every one of them made him smoke harder. I watched Russ light up out of pure spite more than once.
Then one day, at sixty-one, he just stopped. Nobody said a word to him that day. He’d been out on the boat with his grandson, and the boy asked him why he coughed like that, and Russ didn’t have an answer. And that was it.
Well. Nearly it. He had one at a wedding the next year. Then he stopped again.
That’s how change goes. For everyone. Not just Russ.
There’s a couple of researchers, Prochaska and DiClemente, who spent years watching people change. Smokers, as it happens. They worked out people don’t change in one go. They move through stages. And the thing that helps at one stage backfires at the next.
First stage, they’re not thinking about it at all. ‘There’s no problem. You’re the problem.’ Sound familiar?
Then they’re thinking about it. ‘Yeah, maybe. But.’ Everything’s a ‘but’.
Then they’re deciding. ‘I reckon I might try.’
Then they’re doing it.
Then they’re keeping it going, which is quieter than you’d think.
And then, and this is the bit nobody puts on the poster, a lot of people slip. And they go round again. That’s not the end of it. That’s part of it.
Here’s why it matters to you. If your kid’s in that first stage, and you’re doing what you’d do if they were deciding, making plans, ultimatums, ‘from Monday you will’, you’ll get Russ. You’ll get somebody lighting up out of spite.
At the first stage the job is different. The job is keeping the relationship alive, and keeping them safe. That’s it. I know that feels like doing nothing. It isn’t. You’re holding the gate open for the day they walk through it.
When they’re thinking about it, you listen to both sides, the ‘yeah’ and the ‘but’. When they decide, you help them make it small, and make it theirs. When they’re doing it, you notice. Not ‘about time’. Just notice.
And when they slip, you don’t say ‘I knew it’. You ask what they learnt.
One more thing. You’re in one of these stages too, about how you respond to your kid. You might be at ‘yeah, but’. That’s all right. Same rules apply to you.
This week, pick one thing you want to change in your kid. Have a guess which stage they’re at. Then do one thing that helps at that stage, and nothing that backfires.
Russ is seventy now. Still off them. Mostly.
See you at the next one.
Col walks off.
That’s the talk. The same ideas on one page, and what to do with them this week:
Six places a person can be
People don’t change in one step. They move through stages, usually more than once, and
what helps in one stage backfires in another. Your kid is somewhere on this. So are you, about
whatever you’re trying to change in how you parent.
Stage
What it sounds like
What helps
What backfires
Not thinking about it
“There’s no problem. You’re the problem.”
Keeping the relationship. Information without pressure. Keeping them safe.
Lectures and ultimatums. They dig in.
Thinking about it
“Yeah, maybe. But…”
Hearing both sides. Asking what they’d gain and what they’d lose.
Jumping to the plan for them.
Deciding
“I reckon I might try…”
Helping make it small, specific, and theirs.
Taking it over.
Doing it
“I went every day this week.”
Noticing the effort. Practical help.
“About time.”
Keeping it going
Quiet. It’s just normal now.
Still noticing. A plan for the bad days.
Forgetting to notice at all.
Slipping
“I stuffed it.”
Treating a slip as part of the cycle, not the end of it. “What did you learn?”
“I knew it.”
The hardest stage for a parent is the first one, because it feels like doing nothing. It
isn’t. When your kid can’t see a problem yet, keeping the relationship alive and
keeping them safe is the work. You are holding the gate open for the day they walk
through it.
Try this at home
Pick one thing you want to change. Guess which stage your kid is in about it. Look at the
“what helps” for that stage and try one of those this week, and nothing from the
“backfires” column.
Sheet two · for you
Where are we standing?
The thing I want to change:
The stage my kid is in about it (circle one): not thinking · thinking ·
deciding · doing · keeping going · slipping
What I’ve been doing so far:
Does that fit their stage? Yes / No / Not sure
One thing I’ll try instead:
And me. One thing I want to change in how I respond, and my stage about it:
If you’re watching with someone
Think of a change you made yourself. How long were you “thinking about it”?
What did people do that helped? What made you dig in?
Where it comes from. The stages of change, from the
transtheoretical model of James Prochaska and Carlo DiClemente (1983), first described with
people giving up smoking. The stage names here are plain versions of theirs:
pre-contemplation, contemplation, preparation, action, maintenance, and relapse.
Talk three
Talking so it lands
Getting your kid saying their own reasons, instead of arguing with yours.
Col walks on · 3 min 48
Col’s voice is computer-generated. Every word he says is written out below.
I’ve got a grandson who can talk the ears off a donkey about Minecraft. Ask him about school and you’d think he’d taken a vow of silence.
‘How was school?’ ‘Good.’ ‘What’d you do?’ ‘Nothin’.’
Sound familiar?
I went fishing with my old man a lot as a kid. He never said much. But he taught me one thing I’ve never forgotten. You don’t catch a fish by throwing rocks at it. You sit. You’re quiet. You put something in the water it actually wants. And you wait.
Talking to a teenager’s the same. The harder you chase the conversation, the deeper it swims.
There’s a way of talking that people in this line of work use, called motivational interviewing. A bloke called William Miller and another called Stephen Rollnick worked it out. I’ll give you the fishing version.
Here’s what they noticed. People believe what they hear themselves say, a lot more than what they’re told. So when you argue for change, a kid who’s unsure argues the other side. And every time they say it out loud, ‘school’s pointless’, ‘everyone drinks’, they believe it a bit more. You’re helping them build the case against you.
The urge to jump in and fix it has a name. The righting reflex. Every parent’s got it. I’ve got it. The job is to sit on it.
So what do you do instead? Four things.
Ask questions that can’t be answered with a yes or a no. Not ‘did you go today?’, but ‘what’s school like at the moment?’
Notice what’s true and good. Not gushing. ‘You got up this morning even though you were wrecked.’ That’s it.
Say back what you heard. This one feels strange. Your kid says, ‘I’m sick of everyone being on my case.’ And instead of ‘well, if you’d just’, you say, ‘Sounds like you’re over being the one who’s always in trouble.’ Then you stop. And you let the silence sit.
(pause)
Let it sit.
And every now and then, sum it up. ‘So school’s boring, the maths teacher’s on your back, but you miss your mates. Have I got that right?’
Now listen for the good bit. Somewhere in most conversations, a kid’ll say something that leans toward change. ‘I wish I could play footy again.’ ‘I reckon I could pass if I went.’ When you hear it, and this is the hard part, don’t pounce. Don’t say ‘well then!’ Say it back to them. ‘You’d like to be playing footy again.’ And ask for a bit more. ‘What would that take?’
And when they push back, and they will, don’t push harder. ‘You’re not convinced it’s a problem. Fair enough.’ That’s not giving in. That’s leaving the line in the water.
This week, have one conversation with your kid with no advice in it. None. Afterwards, rough count: did you say back more than you asked?
My grandson told me last week he’s worried about a kid at school who gets picked on. I didn’t say a thing except ‘that sounds rough’. He talked for twenty minutes.
Best fish I’ve caught in years.
See you at the next one.
Col walks off.
That’s the talk. The same ideas on one page, and what to do with them this week:
Why telling doesn’t work
People believe what they hear themselves say far more than what they’re told. When you
argue for change, a kid who’s unsure will argue the other side — and every time they
say it out loud, they believe it a bit more. That urge to fix and correct is sometimes called the
righting reflex, and it’s the thing to sit on.
Four things to do instead
Open questions. “What’s school like at the moment?”
instead of “Did you go today?” A question that can be answered yes or no usually
is.
Noticing what’s true and good. Specific, not gushing. “You got
up this morning even though you were wrecked.”
Saying back what you heard — including the feeling under it.
“Sounds like you’re over being the one who’s always in trouble.” This
is the most useful thing on this page, and the one that feels strangest at first.
Summing up. “So school’s boring, the maths teacher’s on
your case, but you miss your mates. Have I got that right?”
Listen for change talk
Somewhere in most conversations, a kid says something that leans toward change —
I wish (wanting), I could (ability), it’d mean (a reason),
I’ve got to (need). When you hear it, don’t pounce. Say it back and ask for
a bit more: “You’d like to be able to go to footy training again. What would that
take?”
And when they push back, don’t push harder. “You’re not convinced it’s
a problem. Fair enough. What would have to happen for it to become one?”
Try this at home
Have one conversation this week with no advice in it at all. Afterwards, rough count: did you
say back more than you asked? Aim for more saying-back.
Sheet three · for you
Open it up
Turn each closed question into an open one.
“Did you go to school today?” →
“Are you drinking again?” →
“Why can’t you just do what you’re told?” →
Something my kid said this week that leaned toward change:
What I said back:
If you’re watching with someone
Take turns: one of you talks for two minutes about something you’re unsure of, the
other only says back what they heard. How did it feel to be on each side?
Where it comes from. Motivational interviewing, developed by
William Miller and Stephen Rollnick (Miller first described it in 1983). The four things above
are its OARS — open questions, affirmations, reflections, summaries. Change talk and the
righting reflex are their terms too.
Talk four
The four rings
More than one way of being close, and how to use all of them.
Col walks on · 4 min 02
Col’s voice is computer-generated. Every word he says is written out below.
My old man never once told me he was proud of me. Not once. Not when I first shore two hundred in a day. Not when I got married. Not when my daughter was born.
But every morning in shearing season, there was a thermos on the ute. And it was already hot.
(pause)
That was him. It counted.
I tell you that because a lot of parents think the only way to be close to your kid is the big talk. The deep and meaningful. And if you’re not having those, you’ve lost them.
You haven’t. There’s more than one way of being near someone.
People who work with families draw it as four rings, one inside the other. It’s a teaching picture, not a science. But it’s a good picture.
The middle ring is sharing something deep. Grief. Joy. The thing you’re frightened of. That’s rare. And it should be.
The next ring out is talking it through. Sorting a problem. Making a plan. Properly listening.
The next ring out is just being around. Same room, not much said. You’re cooking, they’re at the bench on their phone. A long drive. ‘I’m here if you want to talk.’
And the outside ring is apart, but still there. You’re at work, they’re at school, and you’re still in their day. The lunch is packed. Their photo’s on the fridge. Your name’s in their phone as something nice. The thermos is on the ute.
Now, four rules.
Every close relationship needs all four.
Too long in any one ring goes wrong. All deep talks is exhausting. Ask anyone who’s been married a while. And all outside ring is just flatmates.
You need permission to move closer. You can knock on the door of the next ring in. You can’t kick it down.
And the one I want you to take home: when things are tense, the outer rings are the way back in.
Say your kid’s wagging school. Your gut says go straight to the middle. Sit them down, find out what’s really going on. And they shut the door. Of course they do. You tried to go straight to the middle without being let in.
So come in from the outside. Breakfast is on the table whether they go or not. No silent treatment. That’s the outer ring.
Drive them somewhere, footy, a mate’s place, and don’t bring it up. Just be in the car. That’s the next ring.
Then one calm day: ‘What’s the worst bit of school right now?’ And listen. Listen for what the wagging is doing for them. Are they dodging someone? Can’t keep up? Too tired? Is it the one place they feel in charge?
And if one day they tell you the real reason, that’s the middle ring. They let you in. Your job that night is to hear it. Not to fix it. Fixing can wait till morning.
Watch how they react at each ring. A shrug, a joke, a walk-out. Every one of those is telling you how safe it feels to talk. Ask yourself what’d make it a little bit safer.
This week, try one small thing in each ring. The middle one’s optional. You can’t book it.
My old man’s been gone twelve years. I still make a thermos every morning.
See you at the next one.
Col walks off.
That’s the talk. The same ideas on one page, and what to do with them this week:
Ring one — sharing something deep. Grief, joy, the thing
you’re frightened of. Rare, and it should be.
Ring two — talking it through. Planning, sorting a problem,
negotiating, properly listening.
Ring three — being around. Same room, not much said. Cooking while
they sit at the bench. A drive. “I’m here if you want to talk.” “Can I
get your advice on something when you’ve got a minute?”
Ring four — apart but present. You’re at work, they’re
at school, and you’re still there: lunch packed, their photo on the fridge, your name in
their phone as something kind, their room still their room.
Four rules for the rings
Every close relationship needs all four.
Too long in any one ring goes wrong. All deep talks is exhausting. All ring four is
flatmates.
You need permission to move closer. You can invite someone in; you can’t barge.
When things are tense, the outer rings are the way back in.
Worked through: a kid who’s wagging
Ring four. Breakfast is there whether they go or not. No silent
treatment.
Ring three. Drive them somewhere and don’t raise it. Be in the
room.
Ring two. On a calm day: “What’s the worst bit of school right
now?” Then listen for what the wagging is doing for them — dodging someone,
can’t keep up, too tired, or it’s the only place they feel in charge.
Ring one. If they ever tell you the real reason, the job is to hear it. Not
to fix it that night.
At every ring, watch how they react. A shrug, a joke, a walk-out — each is telling you
how safe it feels to talk. Ask yourself what would make it a bit safer at that ring.
Try this at home
One small thing in each ring this week. Ring one is optional — you can’t book
it.
Sheet four · for you
My four rings
How I could be close to my kid in each ring:
Ring one — sharing something deep:
Ring two — talking it through:
Ring three — being around:
Ring four — apart but present:
Which ring do we spend most of our time in? Which one’s gone missing?
If you’re watching with someone
Which ring did your own parents live in with you?
What’s the ring-four thing someone did for you that you still remember?
Where it comes from. This four-level way of drawing closeness
is a teaching tool from family work with parents of young people, not a named research model.
Treat it as a map, not a measurement. The idea behind it — that a young person tells you
more when it feels emotionally safe to — is well supported.
Talk five
Fences, not walls
Warm and firm, what a boundary is, and noticing the good.
Col walks on · 3 min 50
Col’s voice is computer-generated. Every word he says is written out below.
I’ve put up a lot of fence in my time. Here’s what I know about fences.
A good fence does two jobs. It keeps the stock off the road. And it shows them where the good feed is.
A fence that’s all barbs and no gate isn’t a fence. It’s a trap. And no fence at all, well, you’re picking them up off the highway at two in the morning.
Your rules are fences. So let’s check the wire.
A researcher called Diana Baumrind spent years watching how parents raise kids, and what she found comes down to two dials. How warm you are. And how firm you are.
Warm and firm: clear rules, the reasons explained, you listen, and you follow through. That’s the one decades of research say works best for kids.
Firm but not warm: ‘because I said so’. You’ll get a kid who behaves while you’re watching. When you’re not watching, look out.
Warm but not firm: all love, no fence. It feels kind. But the kid has to go looking for the edges on their own, and they usually find them in the worst places.
And neither: checked out. That’s usually a parent running on empty. I’ll come back to that in the last talk.
Nobody lives in one box. I certainly didn’t. When I was tired I went straight to ‘because I said so’. When I felt guilty I went soft. The trick is knowing where you drift when you’re worn out.
So what’s a boundary? It’s a line between what’s okay and what isn’t, and what happens when it’s crossed. Everyone’s got them. You have. And your kid has too. Their room. Their phone. Their body. Their mates. A kid who has their boundaries respected learns to respect yours.
The fence moves with age. A seven-year-old’s fence is close to the house. A sixteen-year-old’s is further out. The whole job of the teenage years is moving that fence out, a panel at a time, as they earn it.
When a boundary gets crossed, and it will, here’s what a consequence that works looks like. They knew about it before. Not something you invented at eleven o’clock at night when you’re furious. It’s connected to what happened. It’s in proportion, and it’s got an end date. You carry it out calmly. And then, and this is the bit people forget, it’s over. Back to normal. No grudge.
One more thing about fences. You don’t only check them when something’s got out. You walk the line when everything’s fine, too.
Same with your kid. Catch them doing the right thing and say so. Out loud. Specific. ‘You texted me when your plans changed. That’s exactly it.’ Do that a lot more often than you correct them. A kid who only hears from you when something’s wrong learns to stop listening.
And under the whole fence line, holding every post up, is listening. That’s the ground the fence stands in.
This week, write down the three rules that matter most in your house. For each one: does your kid know it? Do they know what happens if it’s crossed? And has that actually happened, calmly, every time?
Check the wire. Fix a strand or two.
See you at the next one.
Col walks off.
That’s the talk. The same ideas on one page, and what to do with them this week:
Two dials: warm and firm
Firm
Not firm
Warm
Warm and firm. Clear limits, reasons given, listens, follows through. The combination most linked to good outcomes for kids, over decades of research.
Warm, not firm. All love, no fence. Feels kind; leaves the kid to find the edges on their own.
Not warm
Firm, not warm. “Because I said so.” Gets obedience while you’re watching, and rebellion when you’re not.
Neither. Checked out. Usually a parent running on empty — see talk eight.
Nobody sits in one box. Most parents move around it depending on how tired they are. The aim
is to know where you drift when you’re worn out.
What a boundary is
A boundary is a line between what’s okay and what isn’t, plus what happens when
it’s crossed. Everyone has them. You do. Your kid does too — their room, their phone,
their body, their friends — and respecting theirs is how they learn to respect yours.
Boundaries should fit the age. A seven-year-old’s fence is close in. A
sixteen-year-old’s is further out. The work of the teenage years is moving the fence out,
a panel at a time, as trust is earned.
When a boundary is crossed
A consequence that works is:
known in advance — not invented at eleven at night;
connected to the thing that happened;
in proportion, and for a set time;
carried out calmly — and then it’s over. Back to normal. No
grudge.
If your kid is in the “not thinking about it” stage (talk two), fences are
mostly about safety, and the relationship is about keeping the gate open.
Notice the good, out loud
Catch the behaviour you want and say so, specifically: “You texted me when plans changed.
That’s exactly it.” Do it far more often than you correct. A kid who only hears from
you when something’s wrong learns to stop listening. And under all of it is listening
properly — talk three — which is the ground the fence stands on.
Try this at home
Write down the three rules that matter most in your house. For each one: does your kid know
it? Do they know what happens if it’s crossed? Has that actually happened, calmly, every
time?
Sheet five · for you
Checking the wire
The rule
Do they know it?
What happens if it’s crossed
Connected? In proportion?
Where I drift when I’m tired (circle): too firm · too soft · checked out
Three good things I noticed and said out loud this week:
If you’re watching with someone
What’s a boundary of yours your kid keeps crossing? What’s one of theirs you
might be crossing?
If there are two of you parenting, do you sit in the same box? What happens when you
don’t?
Where it comes from. Parenting styles, from Diana
Baumrind’s research (1966, 1971) and its extension by Eleanor Maccoby and John Martin (1983).
The four boxes are their authoritative, authoritarian, permissive and uninvolved styles, in plain
words.
Talk six
Find the trickle
Questions that look for what’s already working.
Col walks on · 3 min 05
Col’s voice is computer-generated. Every word he says is written out below.
Drought of ’94. Our dam got down to a puddle and a mud crack. I used to go out every morning and just stand there, looking at the dry bit. As if staring at it would help.
My neighbour Bev came over one day and watched me doing it. And she said, ‘Col. Where’s the water still coming in?’
I said, ‘It’s not.’
She said, ‘Go and look.’
Down the back corner, under the tea-tree, there was a trickle. Barely anything. But it had been running the whole time, and I’d never once gone to look, because I was busy staring at the problem.
We dug that trickle out. It carried us through to the rain.
There’s a way of working with families called solution-focused. A couple called Steve de Shazer and Insoo Kim Berg built it. And the whole thing rests on Bev’s question. Where’s the water still coming in?
Every problem has exceptions. Times it was smaller. Times it didn’t happen at all. Those times are where the answers already live. You don’t have to know why the dam went dry to find the trickle.
So, four questions.
The exception. ‘When was the last time school went a bit better? What was different that day?’ Not why was it bad. What was different when it was better.
The scale. ‘Out of ten, where are things at?’ Whatever they say, say it’s a three, you ask, ‘What makes it a three and not a one?’ Because something’s holding it at three. That’s the trickle. Then: ‘What would a four look like?’ Not a ten. A four.
The morning after. ‘Say you woke up tomorrow and things had come good overnight. What’s the first small thing you’d notice?’ Small things. Somebody says good morning. The school bag’s by the door.
And the coping one. ‘This has been hard for a long time. How have you kept going?’ Because they have. And so have you.
Those work just as well on yourself. The scale’s the quickest check-in I know. Where are me and my kid at, out of ten? What’s holding it there?
This week, ask yourself the scale question. Then, on a calm day, ask your kid one exception question. Take whatever answer you get. Even ‘I dunno’. Especially ‘I dunno’. That’s them thinking about it.
Bev’s gone now too. That trickle’s still running.
See you at the next one.
Col walks off.
That’s the talk. The same ideas on one page, and what to do with them this week:
Every problem has exceptions: times it was smaller, or didn’t happen at all. Those times
are where the answers already live, and you don’t need to know why the problem started to
find the next step out of it.
Four questions
The exception. “When was the last time school went a bit better?
What was different that day?”
The scale. “From nought to ten, where are things at?” Then,
whatever the number: “What makes it a three and not a one?” and “What would
one point higher look like?”
The morning after. “Say you woke up tomorrow and things had come
good overnight. What’s the first small thing you’d notice?”
The coping one. “This has been hard for a long time. How have you
kept going?” — for them, and for you.
They work just as well on yourself. The scale is the quickest check-in there is.
Try this at home
Ask yourself the scale question about how things are with your kid. Then, on a calm day, ask
your kid one exception question. Take whatever answer you get.
Sheet six · for you
Finding the trickle
Where things are, nought to ten: ______
Why it isn’t lower:
What one point higher would look like:
A time this week it was a bit better:
What was different:
How I’ve kept going:
If you’re watching with someone
Ask each other the morning-after question. Were your first small things the same?
Where it comes from. Solution-focused brief therapy, developed
by Steve de Shazer and Insoo Kim Berg in the 1980s. Exception, scaling, miracle and coping
questions are its tools; the “morning after” is their miracle question in plainer
clothes.
Talk seven
When it’s risky
Keeping them safe while they’re not ready to stop, too wound up and too shut down,
and when it’s more than a rough patch.
Col walks on · 3 min 58
Col’s voice is computer-generated. Every word he says is written out below.
This is the heavy one. So I’ll be straight with you from the start.
Parts of this one aren’t mine to say. I’m a shearer, not a nurse. So I’m going to talk about the bits a parent can hold. Then I’m going to walk off, and this page hands you over to what the people who do the rest for a living say. There’s no shame in making that call. None. I’ve made it.
First bit. Your kid’s drinking, or using, and they’re not ready to stop.
Remember Russ and the smokes? If your kid’s at that first stage, no problem, you’re the problem, then no amount of fear is going to stop them tonight. So the goal changes. For now, the goal is three things. Alive. Safe. And still talking to you.
That’s not approving. That’s keeping the gate open.
In practice it looks like this. You know who they’re with and how they’re getting home. And you make a deal. The no-questions-tonight deal. ‘Ring me. Any time. I’ll come and get you. We’ll talk tomorrow.’ And then, and this is the hard bit, you keep your end of it. You pick them up, and you don’t say a word in the car.
You make sure they know that ringing triple zero for a mate is always the right call. And what an emergency looks like: can’t be woken, breathing funny, fitting, badly confused.
Eat first. Water. Don’t mix things. Never leave a mate on their own.
Australia’s had a name for this for a long time. Harm minimisation. The national drug strategy’s built on it. It’s not giving up. It’s keeping them alive till they’re ready.
Second bit. Too wound up, and too shut down.
You know when a mob gets stirred up in the yards. Dogs barking, someone yelling. You can’t do a thing with them. Can’t draft them, can’t count them. You wait. You let them settle.
People are the same. Everyone’s got a zone where they can think and feel and talk all at once. A bloke called Dan Siegel called it the window of tolerance. Go over the top of it and you’re in fight or flight. Heart pounding, yelling, can’t hear a word. Drop below the bottom and you go flat. Numb. ‘Whatever.’ Switched off.
Kids who’ve had frightening things happen to them often have a narrower window, and they tip out of it faster.
Nobody learns anything outside that window. Nobody negotiates. And that includes you.
So the big talk waits till you’re both back inside it. First bring things down, or up. Fewer words. Slow breaths, longer on the way out. A walk. A glass of water. Feet on the floor. Talk later. Later is fine.
Now. The third bit. When it’s more than a rough patch. When you’re worried your kid might hurt themselves, or doesn’t want to be here.
That one’s not mine. I’m going to walk off now, and the next part of this page says it plainly, with the numbers you need. Please read it. Put the numbers on the fridge, even if you never need them.
You don’t carry this one alone. Nobody should.
Col walks off.
That’s the talk. What follows is for after Col’s gone: the same ideas on one page, the part that’s handed over, and what to do with it this week.
Safe while they’re not ready to stop
If your kid is drinking or using and isn’t ready to stop — the first stage from
talk two — the goal for now becomes: alive, safe, and still talking to
you. That isn’t approving. It’s keeping the door open.
Know who they’re with and how they’re getting home.
Make the no-questions-tonight deal: ring me, I’ll come and get you, and we’ll
talk tomorrow. Then keep your end of it.
Make sure they know that calling 000 for a mate is always the right call, and what an
emergency looks like: can’t be woken, breathing oddly, fitting, badly confused.
Eat first, drink water, don’t mix things, never leave a mate on their own.
Too wound up, too shut down
Everyone has a zone where they can think, feel and talk at the same time. Push past the top of
it and you get pounding heart, yelling, can’t hear a word — fight or flight. Drop
below the bottom and you get flat, numb, spaced out, “whatever” — shutdown.
Kids who’ve had frightening things happen to them often have a narrower zone, and tip out
of it faster.
Nobody learns or negotiates outside that zone. That includes you. So the big talk waits until
you’re both back inside it. First bring things down (or up): fewer words, slow breaths with a
longer out-breath, a walk, a glass of water, feet on the floor. Talk later. Later is fine.
When it’s more than a rough patch
This part is handed over. It’s here so you know what to look for and who to ring —
not so you can manage it on your own.
Take it seriously if your kid: talks about wanting to die or being a burden;
gives things away or says goodbyes; looks up ways to hurt themselves; hurts themselves; pulls away
from everyone; or turns suddenly calm after a long low stretch.
What to do:
Ask straight out: “Are you thinking about suicide?” Asking does not put the idea
in their head. It tells them they can talk to you.
Listen. Don’t argue them out of how they feel.
If you think they’re in danger now, don’t leave them alone, move anything they
could use out of reach if you safely can, and ring 000.
Get help in, even when it’s not an emergency. You don’t carry this alone.
13YARN · 13 92 76 — run by and for Aboriginal and Torres
Strait Islander people.
Kids Helpline, 1800 55 1800 — for your kid, if they’re between five and
twenty-five. Parentline, 1300 30 1300 — for you, in Queensland and the Northern
Territory.
Then your GP, and ongoing support — counselling at
ParkSyde is one option. ParkSyde isn’t a crisis service.
And look after yourself through it. A parent who has been through this needs someone to talk to
as well.
Try this at home
On a calm day, talk about the no-questions-tonight deal. Agree on the words. Put the numbers
above on the fridge.
Sheet seven · for you and your kid
Our plan
When my kid is too wound up, it looks like:
When they’re shut down, it looks like:
What helps them back:
When I’m out of my zone, it looks like — and what brings me back:
Where it comes from. Harm minimisation is the approach of
Australia’s National Drug Strategy. The zone is the window of tolerance, a term from Daniel
Siegel’s The Developing Mind (1999); above and below it are hyperarousal and
hypoarousal. The advice on asking about suicide follows Australian suicide-prevention guidance:
asking directly does not raise the risk.
Talk eight
Filling your own tank
Self-care that isn’t selfish, and five minutes of noticing.
Col walks on · 3 min 42
Col’s voice is computer-generated. Every word he says is written out below.
I want to tell you about the dumbest thing I ever did in a shed.
Big day. We were behind. I’d skipped breakfast, skipped smoko, and by early arvo I was running on nothing but stubbornness. And I took a strip of skin off a ewe. Then very nearly off my own thumb.
The boss sat me down on a wool bale and handed me a sandwich and said, ‘You’re no good to anyone empty, Col.’
He was right. And you’re no good to that kid running on fumes.
Looking after yourself isn’t selfish. It’s maintenance. Same as the ute. You don’t skip the oil change because you’re too busy driving.
Self-care sounds like bubble baths. Mostly it isn’t. It’s the boring stuff. Enough sleep. Decent food. Moving your body. Time with people who are good for you. Something that makes you laugh. One thing a day that’s just yours. And the doctor’s appointment you’ve been putting off for eight months. Yes. That one.
Here’s how you know the tank’s running dry. Shorter fuse with your kid. Snapping at the people you love. Bad sleep. No energy. Can’t think straight. And that feeling that nothing’s ever going to change.
If that sounds like your week, this talk matters more than the other seven put together.
One thing before I go. It’s called mindfulness. I thought that was for people in activewear. It’s not. It just means paying attention to what’s happening right now, without having to judge it or fix it. There’s good evidence it helps a lot of people with stress. It isn’t a cure, and it doesn’t suit everybody. But five minutes is a fine start.
So let’s do some. Right now. Wherever you are.
Sit. Feet flat on the floor. Notice the floor pushing back.
Three slow breaths. Longer on the way out.
(pause)
Now find five things you can see. Four things you can hear. Three things you can feel: the chair, your clothes, the air. Two things you can smell. One thing you can taste.
(pause)
Notice what your mind keeps wandering back to. You don’t have to do anything with it. Just notice it’s there. Then come back to your feet.
One more slow breath.
That’s it. That’s the whole thing.
(pause)
That’s the last talk. So here’s the last thing.
They’re called Paddock Talks for a reason. When the season’s bad, a drover doesn’t sell the mob and he doesn’t force it. He takes them down the long paddock, the stock route along the road. Slow. Where the feed is. Keeps them moving till the rain comes.
You’ll walk bits of that paddock more than once. And when the rain comes, and it does, you won’t remember the day it turned. You’ll just notice the feed’s back.
Look after yourself. Look after that kid.
Col walks off.
That’s the talk. The same ideas on one page, and what to do with them this week:
What self-care is
Self-care is deliberately doing the things that keep your body and mind running —
especially when things are hardest and it feels like there’s no time. The basics: enough
sleep, decent food, moving your body, time with people who are good for you, something that makes
you laugh, one thing a day that’s just yours, and the appointments you’ve been putting
off.
When the tank runs dry it shows: a shorter fuse with your kid, strain on your other
relationships, bad sleep, low energy, finding it hard to think, feeling like nothing will change.
If that list sounds like your week, this session matters more than the other seven.
Wellbeing has a few parts, and they lean on each other: your body, your feelings, your people,
your sense of purpose, and the community around you.
Noticing
Mindfulness means paying attention to what’s happening right now — thoughts,
feelings, what your body’s doing — without having to judge it or fix it. There is
good evidence that regular practice helps many people with stress, and helps some with anxiety
and low mood. It isn’t a cure and it doesn’t suit everyone. Five minutes is a fine
start.
Five minutes, read slowly
Sit down. Feet flat on the floor. Notice the floor pushing back.
Three slow breaths, the out-breath longer than the in.
Name five things you can see. Four you can hear. Three you can feel — the chair, your
clothes, the air. Two you can smell. One you can taste.
Notice what your mind keeps going back to. You don’t have to do anything with it.
Just notice it’s there, and come back to your feet.
One more slow breath. Then get on with your day.
If you’d like more of this, Smiling Mind is a free mindfulness app from an Australian
not-for-profit.
Sheet eight · for you
My self-care wheel
Two things in each part that work for you and could fit into an ordinary week.
Body (sleep, food, moving):
Mind (rest, learning, quiet):
Feelings (letting it out, a laugh):
People (who’s good for you):
Purpose (work, the things you care about):
Place and community (outdoors, belonging somewhere):
The one I’ll start this week:
If you’re watching with someone
How does your own state change the way you talk to your kid?
How do you make your self-care a priority when there’s no time? Who could help you
protect it?
After the eight talks
Looking back
A sheet for you, to see what stuck. Nobody collects it. If you want to tell us what worked and
what didn’t, get in touch — that’s how the next edition
gets better.
Looking back · for you
What stuck
Did the course give you what you hoped for?
How useful was each talk? 0 is not at all, 5 is very. Skip any you didn’t get to.
Talk
0 1 2 3 4 5
1 · Doing the best they can
2 · Where they’re at
3 · Talking so it lands
4 · The four rings
5 · Fences, not walls
6 · Find the trickle
7 · When it’s risky
8 · Filling your own tank
The things I’ve actually tried with my kid:
How confident I feel using them, 0 to 5: ______
What was missing, or what I’d have liked more of:
About Col’s voice. It is computer-generated.
It’s “Charlie”, a stock synthetic voice from ElevenLabs’ voice library, which lists it as
an Australian man. ParkSyde generated it through its Blotato account and kept his own rhythm,
adding only a breath between paragraphs. It is not the voice of any real person at ParkSyde,
and it was not cloned from anyone. The words are the page’s own.
Some things need the person who does them
Parent programmes like this one have always brought people in for the parts a course
can’t cover: a psychologist on trauma and on suicide risk, someone from drug and alcohol
services, someone who knows the youth justice system and the courts, someone from education.
Col can’t be any of them, and he doesn’t try. The Forum’s stage takes more than one speaker.
If that’s your work, the Forum is open to you. Tell us what
you’d put on at get in touch.